APR allows working farms to be passed from the principal farmer upon their death to the next farming generation, by making such businesses free from Inheritance Tax so long as they are working farming businesses.
Significant changes to, or the abolition of, APR could have a disproportionate effect on small family farms, which are the backbone of British agriculture.
NFU analysis of APR suggests that scrapping it would only save the Treasury 拢120 million a year, whilst the negative impact on farming would be much larger.
The Union recently wrote to Chancellor Rachel Reeves about the vital need to protect family farms and tenants through APR, and NFU President Tom Bradshaw also made the case to the Chancellor at the Labour Party Conference in Liverpool this year.
Mr Bradshaw said today: 鈥淣FU members keep seeing these alarming media reports and they are understandably worried and upset. Major APR changes would put at risk many farming families鈥� succession plans and consequently undermine the government鈥檚 own ambitions for food and environmental security.
鈥淚鈥檓 also very concerned that changes would damage the tenanted sector, as landowners will have much less incentive to let land to agricultural tenants. In short, this 鈥淔amily Farm Tax鈥�, which is what removing APR amounts to, could be too much for some farming businesses which are already struggling with numerous challenges.鈥�
Mr Bradshaw added: 鈥淔arming is often a generational business, and APR is what makes it possible for small family farms to pass from one generation to another. We鈥檝e given the Treasury the details and evidence for our concerns and we stand ready to meet ministers and officials again, at any time, to reinforce the point that a Family Farm Tax could push many small family farming businesses over the edge.鈥�