The article - - reports on comments made by Sir John Armitt, chairman of the National Infrastructure Commission, where he suggests during an interview with the BBC that 鈥渢he land should be kept for at least two or three years to give the opportunity for people to revisit that and look at what can be done within that space and find a more cost-effective solution, not write it off today鈥�.
The news follows the Prime Minister's announcement earlier in the month that the high-speed line between Birmingham and Manchester is set to be scrapped.
Read the letter below:
To the editor,
As farmers trying to feed the nation, we do not need any more uncertainty and delay when it comes to HS2. The notion in your article 鈥樷�� that land purchased for the second leg, now scrapped, should be kept for up to three years will create even more uncertainty and further complications for farm businesses.
Businesses which are already suffering from the scale of land acquired permanently and the lack of compensation and mitigation.
It is vital that the DfT (Department for Transport) delivers land back to former landowners and occupiers as swiftly as possible and a fair resolution is reached. This includes ensuring that safeguarding is lifted on land taken out of production for Phase 2a in the coming weeks and no later than the next year for Phase 2b as stated in the government鈥檚 latest paper on HS2.
Former landowners must be offered the opportunity to purchase back land taken under compulsory purchase. To do this DfT should deliver the programme highlighted in the government鈥檚 own paper as soon as possible so that farm businesses, which have been so badly disrupted by this project can get back to doing what they do best, producing climate-friendly, nutritious food.
David Exwood
NFU Vice President
