皇家华人has responded to AHDB's review which was primarily aimed at gathering insights from 耻蝉别谤蝉.听
User feedback from the questionnaire, according to AHDB, is necessary to inform the future development of RB209.
As stated by AHDB, the RB209 is recognised as the industry standard for nutrient management information. The guide is also updated annually, incorporating evidence from research commissioned by AHDB and its partners.
Now, AHDB is undertaking the first large-scale strategic review since 2016.
Review aims
Its review aims to:
- clearly define the scope, role and purpose of RB209
- identify short, medium and long-term priorities to develop RB209鈥檚 technical content
- review the format of the guidance, including the potential for greater use of digital channels
- maintain the delivery of independent and robust guidance on nutrient management, and
- renew the remit of the UK Partnership for Crop Nutrient Management.
NFU position
The RB209 Nutrient Management Guide has been central to the sustained productivity and profitability of UK farming, particularly the arable sector, and the NFU recognises the value which it has in supporting decision making on farm.
However, while RB209 is regarded as an economic guide for growers, we are concerned that some parties regard it as more of a regulatory guide to be used as a tool across enforcement and policy development.
We believe that RB209 should state that the purpose of the document is not to act as a regulatory guide or legislative tool.
Additionally, this year's relentless wet weather has highlighted the need to move towards a more adaptable approach to nutrient assessment.
NFU members can log in and download our response in full: RB209 review 鈥� NFU response.
